Monday, February 28, 2011

Document from O2 and Vodaphone

CELL REF:     CS 018465 (O2 048983, VF TBC)
SITE NAME:  LOWRY HILL ROAD
ADDRESS:    GRASS VERGE ADJACENT TO WEST BOUND LANEWAY OF JOWRY HILL ROAD, KINGMOOR, CARLISLE, CA3 0DF
NGR:              339580E, 558693N

Designated Search Area & Discounted Site Information
 
The red lined area signifies the Designated Search Area within which a solution must be found in order to address the present coverage requirement in the most efficient manner.

1)    Existing “3” & T-Mobile sites (Cell Refs: CA0148 & 97245) Arqiva Tower (Ref: 94458) at land adjacent Lowry Gardens
NGR: 339360E, 558820N
Whilst we appreciate that both national and local planning policy suggest a preference for the use of established telecommunications sites, this particular mast is located beyond the northern boundary of the DSA and as such could not address the present coverage deficit in an efficient manner. Please also note that despite the above the mast could not be shared by our clients without an increase in height to separate the existing apparatus form that required in order to prevent interference and to achieve the necessary antenna heights. This would undoubtedly create a prominent focal point within a sensitive residential area. As such the use of the subject site and design was considered to offer a more appropriate solution from both a planning and operational perspective.

is already a dominant feature within the locale and

2)    Existing O2 site (Cell Ref: 004981) off Millbrook Road, Kingstown Industrial Estate
NGR: 339368E, 559278N
As you will appreciate, any telecommunications network operates through the joining of cell areas within which a solution must be found. This established base station is located too far north of the DSA to be able to address the present coverage requirement and is actually being considered as a solution for the adjoining cell area. As such it must be discounted on operational merit.

3)    St Peters Church, Kingstown Road
NGR: 339545E, 558902N
Whilst ecclesiastical properties are often used by telecommunications operators in order to install antennas within steeples/bell towers, this church does not benefit from any such features. Furthermore, it is well removed from the DSA. As a result, and with consideration for its low roof level, any development upon this building or even within its grounds could not address the present coverage requirement and must be discounted on operational merit.

4)    Commercial estate along Kingstown Broadway
NGR: Various
Despite offering the possibility of deploying infrastructure without any conflict with residential or sensitive viewpoints, this commercial estate is located too far north of the DSA to allow for any base station development to be able to address the present coverage requirement. As such, it must be discounted on operational merit.

5)    Kingmoor Junior School, Liddle Close
NGR: 339220E, 558560N
Located on the western periphery of the DSA, this large educational building was identified during a survey of the area. Whilst a new ground based mast could be deployed within the school grounds, proposals on educational properties only tend to be progressed as a last resort due to previous problems with community opposition and the resulting impact and disruption this tends to cause to the workings of the host property. As a result of the above, and given that the subject solution offers a viable planning option, the use of this property has been discounted. However, should the LPA wish us to investigate the potential use of this property further we would be happy to do so.

6)    New street furniture development adjacent to commercial properties, Hether Drive
NGR: 339133E, 558508N
This commercial parade adjacent to the aforementioned educational property offers the only mixed use pocket of note within close proximity of the DSA. Whilst there would be enough space to deploy a new street furniture base station at this location we would consider that this site would be overlooked by a larger number of residential frontages than the subject site. The potential impact upon residential amenity was considered to be greater at this location and as such this option has been discounted as being less appropriate from a planning perspective.

7)    Recreational ground west of Moorville Drive
NGR: Various
Whilst this large recreational ground would undoubtedly have space for a new base station development its location well beyond the southern boundaries of the DSA along with a slight decrease in topographical level would prevent any solution from being able to address the present coverage requirement. As such this option must be discounted on operational merit.

8)    New street furniture development within central residential area (including Liddle Close, Naworth Drive, Sanderson Close, St Peter’s Drive, Ritson Close)
NGR: Various
Limited pavement/verge widths and the presence of both underground and over head services all place serious limitations on potential site options for a new street furniture development. Those that are available have residential properties located on both sides of the road and offer little screening or back drop to any potential development option. It is therefore considered that any base station development within this area would have a greater degree of impact upon residential amenity than the subject solution and as such this option has been discounted as being less appropriate than the subject solution on planning merit.

9)    New street furniture development along Kingstown Road
NGR: Various
As above

10) New street furniture development within residential area west and north west of DSA (including Lowry Hill Road W, Hether Drive, Sark Close, Netherby Drive, Lowry Close)
NGR: Various
Similar to the above, limited options are available with any potentially viable site being directly overlooked by a larger number of residential frontages when compared with the subject site. Furthermore, due to the removed location west of the DSA, any development would not offer an efficient coverage solution. As such, this option has been discounted on planning and operational merit.

11) Any development east of Kingstown Road
NGR: Various
As above

Response from O2 and Vodafone

Dear Mr Rowell

Thank you for your email concerning our proposed mobile phone base station at Lowery Hill Road, Kingmoor.  You wrote to our agent, Mr Jodie Kane of WFS Telecom.  Your email has been passed to the Cornerstone Team to respond.

Firstly, may I say, we are committed to investing to ensure that O2 and Vodafone customers who live and work in Kingmoor can benefit from a mobile phone network they can rely upon.  Our agent has made a detailed analysis of the area and found this to be the most suitable site for current and future coverage and capacity whilst blending with the streetscape.  Customers who use mobile data and smart phone handsets require good 3G mobile network coverage.  As a slim-line column our equipment will blend with other street furniture items, such as lighting columns. 

Answers to your specific questions are given below.

Mobile phones have become an essential part of everyday life for the vast majority of people in the UK. O2 and Vodafone’s network development is largely determined by consumer demand. Customers wish to be able to use their phones wherever they are and we understand that this demand must be met with a responsible approach to network development. As you may appreciate, it can at times be difficult to balance the needs of our customers with the views of residents, who often own mobile phones but do not want to have masts located in their communities. 

We recognise there are concerns from some members of the public about the safety of mobile phones and masts. However, the World Health Organization and most scientists agree that there is no evidence to suggest a link between mobile phones or masts and ill health. It is also our policy to be fully compliant with the detail and the spirit of the Code of Best Practice on Mobile Phone Network Development. Equally, masts are essential infrastructure and we have a duty to meet the needs of the silent majority who want to use their mobile phones and accept that mobile phones require mobile phone masts.

Attached are three documents, one on how mobile phones work, the second contains information on health-related issues and the third is from the World Health Organisation, for your information.

Further information can be found on the following websites:


•           http://www.hpa.org.uk/



Thank you once again for your email.  Should you would wish to discuss our proposal further please contact either myself or our Regional Communications Manager,  Tom Powell on 07980 868 001 (tom.powell@cornerstonemobile.net).

Regards


Kevin Hull
EMF Enquiries - Member of the Cornerstone Team  and
Employee of Telefónica O2 UK Ltd
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1330 The Exchange
Arlington Business Park
Theale, Berks, RG7 4SA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tel. 01753 564 306 Mbl 07764 658 537 Fax 01635 673 890
Network Infrastructure Share O2 & Vodafone

O2 and Vodafone have formed a project called Cornerstone, whereby both operators share new and existing mobile phone base stations.  This will allow an improvement in network coverage for customers, whilst minimising the number of new sites required.  Our focus, at present, is on improving network coverage to cities, large towns, and other urban areas. 



Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Second Response from WFS

Dear Sir,

May I apologise for the delay in the operators’ response to your initial correspondence.

I can, however, confirm that the matter is in hand and that one of the community liaison managers will be in touch with you at the earliest opportunity

Thanks for you patience

Jodie

Monday, February 14, 2011

Second Email to WFS after no response from O2 or Vodafone

Jodie,

I have not heard anything from o2 and Vodafone yet and I think the closing
date for comments is today or tomorrow.

We cannot really comment as a residents association without answers to the
questions I posed in my first email... namely...


1. Can you explain the level of flexibility regarding the location of the
base
station?

In other words as far as functionality is concerned could it be put
anywhere
in a 5km radius or must it be placed within a particular 500m radius?

2. Can you explain the requirment for access to street services. Must it be
actually on the main Kingstown Road or are there other roads on which it
could be sited with minimal implications in terms of cost?

Many thanks for your help,

Andrew Rowell
Chairman
Lowry Hill Residents Association

Response from WFS to first Email

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your email.

O2 and Vodafone’s community liaison team have requested that all responses be forwarded to them in order that they may in turn address any issues raised directly. A member of their management team will be in touch with you at the earliest opportunity.

Regards

Jodie

Initial Email in response to WFS letter

Dear Jodie,

I am the chairman of the Lowry Hill Residents Association.
I have been informed by residents on the estate of a pre-application
consultation with local community regarding a proposed telecom base station.

I would like to put a piece in the local newsletter regarding this and would
like to get my facts correct.

I have copies of the information sent to the residents of the estate
immediately adjacent to the proposed development.

Can you explain the level of flexibility regarding the location of the base
station?

In other words as far as functionality is concerned could it be put anywhere
in a 5km radius or must it be placed within a particular 500m radius?

Can you explain the requirment for access to street services. Must it be
actually on the main Kingstown Road or are there other roads on which it
could be sited with minimal implications in terms of cost?

Have you got a reasonable quality image of the base station that you intend
to site here?

Many thanks for your help with this,

Andrew Rowell

Lowry Hill Residents Association
Carlisle

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Questionnaire

The questionnaire for your comments is here.

A 12.5 metre 3G Mobile Phone mast at the entrance to the estate?


On the 1st February a number of residents have received consultation letters from WFS (a company which installs telecoms equipment for Vodafone and O2) about a possible 12.5m 3G mobile phone base station installation. This base station is proposed for the site shown in the image above- the main entrance to our estate. The deadline (15th February)  for the receipt of comments concerning this “pre-application consultation” will be passed before you receive this newsletter. However there will need to be a proper planning application submitted and passed before this installation can go ahead. I would like to submit a response on behalf of the residents association and would therefore welcome your comments about this proposal. Of course you should also submit your own comments to the local council planning meeting. To enable the easier collection of comments I have set up a form to allow you to submit your comments on the Lowry Hill residents association website (www.lhra.org.uk) You can also see images of the proposed planning application there. Alternatively you can send me your comments by email (lhrablog@gmail.com) or by post (226, Lowry Hill Road, Carlisle CA3 0EG) …or drop them round to me.

WFS telecom Ltd Documents

These are images of the WFS Documents: